• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

How Silly is Climate Change Denial?

Free episodes:

Don't even try to educate me on UN crap Tyger. You don't know shit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Coal got us out of caves and producing products.
What do you have to replace coal and oil?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We dont necessarily need to if we scale down our our population. Its only an issue when too many people need too much industrial activity to support their lifestyle.

Again, china has all the ingredients and obvious results.

Too many people

Population growth driving climate change, poverty: experts
 
like most people in this country I believe in a balanced approach one that helps deal with pollutants but does not cripple people's jobs and companies that provide those jobs. However… There is a bigger issue here that nobody ever talks about. Whether or not climate change is something that is occurring naturally and or with the help of modern man, I think that it is inevitable and that it is happening some day and what we really need to be talking about is preparing for it because I don't think at this point we're really going to stop it. I of course, am not saying we shouldn't do anything to, at least slow it down but I do think we need to think differently about how we are going to live in the future because big climate changes have occurred on this planet and they are likely to occur in the future.
 
WHY YOU SHOULD LOOK OUT THE WINDOW

This article talks about the lake freeze over effect.
Why We Should Be Thankful For the Cold - WhoWhatWhy There is a problem with it. It states that:Except that things are more complicated, and the most descriptive term probably isn’t “global warming” – or even “climate change”; it is Climate Chaos. And this ongoing phenomenon is fueled by global warming—even the heavy snows in Buffalo are a result of warming. Thanks to the overall heating of the planet, the Great Lakes are more often ice-free. And when a cold blast from the arctic flows over the warmer lake water, it picks up moisture and turns it into snow. This is the “lake effect.”
This was not true last year. Last year we had more snow than ever and the lake froze over so the snow was not coming from the lake.
Lake levels should drop and were dropping, until about two years ago, because the snow was being taken from the lakes and dumped on the land. Last year the land and the lake got an abundance of rain and snow. Lake levels are above a 98 year average.. In the 90's it was hot and dry here. We got smoke from the forest fires up north. But starting in the new millennium the temperatures have been dropping. The way it rains has been changing too. It is either cloudy, precipitating, or their is a haze in the sky.
Last year they said was a result of the polar vortex. I had never heard of a polar vortex before last year. Where did the term come from? We are experiencing climate change but is it getting hotter, colder, or just more volatile?
Is the increased volcanic activity connected, the increased number of fireballs being reported connected?
 
Last year they said was a result of the polar vortex. I had never heard of a polar vortex before last year. Where did the term come from? We are experiencing climate change but is it getting hotter, colder, or just more volatile?
Is the increased volcanic activity connected, the increased number of fireballs being reported connected?


Last 2 years have been officially geo-engineered vortex's, obamy made a big speech about his top secret chemtrailing trial, in which they used military and civilian airliners.
And how extreely effective it had been in shifting the jet-stream, to cause the vortex's

Thats the haze you are seeing, you just cannot taste the nano particles, he has now run the chemtrial project country wide, congress be damned, obamy is going to save the world, and WE are ALL going to breathe his heavy metal nano particles, whether we like it or not, i wouldnt be surprised if the idiot tried to bill us for his largesse.

Do you not think thats something the greenies et al, should be jumping up and down flapping about.
 
Last edited:
"Officials at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration are already reporting that 2014 appears likely to be the warmest year on record."

"The objective now," negotiators warn before the upcoming Lima, Peru --- United Nations summit meeting to draft an agreement intended to stop the global rise of planet-warming greenhouse gases --- " is to stave off atmospheric temperature increases of 4 to 10 degrees; at that point," they say, "the planet could become increasingly uninhabitable." "Without a deal," scientists say, "eventual human extinction is possible."

Quotes: New York Times INTERNATIONAL Monday, December 1, 2014
 
Show us the temps for 2013 and 2014. I bet it is 1/100 of a difference. Run away!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The warm year and higher CO2 levels have giving us record crop harvests around the world. This is great news yet our alarmists continue to wet their pants and wring their hands in worry. LMAO.
 
Mike now study natural and and asteroid impacts on the environment.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The issues are things we have control of and can therefore change, not things we cant.

Is your argument seriously, well an asteroid might come and do lots of damage anyway, so lets just destroy the environment anyway.
 
The warm year and higher CO2 levels have giving us record crop harvests around the world. This is great news yet our alarmists continue to wet their pants and wring their hands in worry. LMAO.

Evidence - cite, please. Backup for categoric statements. Perhaps instead of calling names and simply contradicting, you could provide some counterargument? Or even a refutation?
 
Back
Top