imjohn
Paranormal Novice
It would harm my bank account by whatever the amount the astrologer charged.I mean what harm could it do?
Nope.Whaddya say, willing to give it a go?
NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
It would harm my bank account by whatever the amount the astrologer charged.I mean what harm could it do?
Nope.Whaddya say, willing to give it a go?
It would harm my bank account by whatever the amount the astrologer charged.
Nope.
I have no desire to attempt to prove the validity of astrology to you and anyone else.
I have no desire to attempt to prove the validity of astrology to you and anyone else.
Pixelshith, jtaylor,would you care to back that up? -to 77%?
Pixelshith, jtaylor,would you care to back that up? -to 77%?
Then we need to close this thread.
The best way to validate astrology is to get a reading from an experienced astrologer and if you two clowns are too gutless to go and get one then you should shut your mouths until you do. I don't want to hear your feeble excuses: "oh it costs money", oh i haven't got time". Put up or shut up.Talk about a person who is unwilling to put their money where there mouth is. You are the supporter of astrology.
The best way to validate astrology is to get a reading from an experienced astrologer and if you two clowns are too gutless to go and get one then you should shut your mouths until you do. I don't want to hear your feeble excuses: "oh it costs money", oh i haven't got time". Put up or shut up.
I will do the reading for free.
---------- Post added at 07:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:23 PM ----------
imjohn... I am getting that your name may or may not be john... you may or may not be a male... you are probably standing directly over the center of the Earth... I am seeing you exhaling CO2... Your mother had at least one child and .... oh yes... I am seeing that your mother is a female... how am I doing? Any of this make sense to you?
I will do the reading for free.
---------- Post added at 07:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:23 PM ----------
imjohn... I am getting that your name may or may not be john... you may or may not be a male... you are probably standing directly over the center of the Earth... I am seeing you exhaling CO2... Your mother had at least one child and .... oh yes... I am seeing that your mother is a female... how am I doing? Any of this make sense to you?
Yes, yes it does. You know when pixel is involved in any thread it is time to close it . Please one of you mods, close this thread before pixelsmith chimes in with another "...please laugh at me. I'm pretending to be a psychic!" gag.
Stick to your truther, 9/11 subjects pal. At least, on the surface, you kind of look intelligent in those threads.
The best way to validate astrology is to get a reading from an experienced astrologer and if you two clowns are too gutless to go and get one then you should shut your mouths until you do. I don't want to hear your feeble excuses: "oh it costs money", oh i haven't got time". Put up or shut up.
Aw!? Did your feelings get hurt?
A single reading from a cold reading astrologer does NOTHING to validate astrology.
Well i'm glad to see that you recognize being called an ignoramus when you're being one. Excellent! Congrats. I have no problems with ad hominems, whether they be toward or from me. I can go at it all day if you like. The thing is you are not adding anything to this thread except for ignorant pronouncements about a subject you no nothing about. You just keep repeating your tired opinion. Ok. We get it. You think astrology is worthless.Ah, sadly I believe you are the person who is making ad hominem attacks. Unless you consider calling someone a dick head, ignoramus, etc. To not be ad hominem. Pot meet kettle.
Shut down the thread if you wish. Just remember who seems to have abused whatever standards apply here.
Well i'm glad to see that you recognize being called an ignoramus when you're being one. Excellent! Congrats. I have no problems with ad hominems, whether they be toward or from me. I can go at it all day if you like. The thing is you are not adding anything to this thread except for ignorant pronouncements about a subject you no nothing about. You just keep repeating your tired opinion. Ok. We get it. You think astrology is worthless.
So unless you have something of any value to add to this riveting discussion i suggest you transport over to the JREF forums where you and your pseudosceptic mates can guffaw and giggle over other subjects you no nothing about.
As i take it you have never studied astrology and have no idea what makes up a chart or how to interpret one. Therefore all you can come up with to add is one of your classics:
"A single reading from a cold reading astrologer does NOTHING to validate astrology.. ", or my personal favorite, "...meh, it's worthless".
But if you wish you can respond to this post with another pearl of wisdom and give me another reason to call you names etc. Your choice. Or someone can chime in with something resembling a reasonable discussion. Or the thread can be closed down.
Other than that, I take it you will have no more to add.
Oh, the pain, the horror. An anonymous person on the internet who spells the word "know" as "no" has called me an ignoramus, ignorant and unreasonable because I dare to question the validity of astrology! How shall I live with myself?!
Shall I go and guffaw with my brethren at the JREF? Perhaps I shall gnash my teeth and rend my garments....
No. I think I will quietly laugh and consign this anonymous person to the dustbin of those who react with extreme hostility when faced with simple questions.
Adios, señor bobo. Vaya con dios.
Sure is. I wonder how Shermer feels about being showed in such a less than stellar way then? It must be a real bitch when TV does that to you.
I got one for you. How about you find out who the best astrologer in your area is, go there and get a fully comprehensive reading from them and see if it makes astrology any more valid to you or not. I mean what harm could it do? If it ends up being shit then you can say to your satisfaction that you tried it and it never worked for you. Whaddya say, willing to give it a go?
That has it's risks Philip. An Astrologer might have a good reputation in your local town or city, or wherever, and be considered good by people who attended a reading by him or her, but people can be fooled and often are!
The first experiment in the video you posted, is a perfect example of what lot of fake Astrologers do, they cold read you from the beginning to the end. The often meet you in person so the get a feel for you, ask you a few questions and in kind learn lot about you!
Oh, the pain, the horror. An anonymous person on the internet who spells the word "know" as "no" has called me an ignoramus, ignorant and unreasonable because I dare to question the validity of astrology! How shall I live with myself?!
Shall I go and guffaw with my brethren at the JREF? Perhaps I shall gnash my teeth and rend my garments....
No. I think I will quietly laugh and consign this anonymous person to the dustbin of those who react with extreme hostility when faced with simple questions.
Adios, señor bobo. Vaya con dios.
That's correct Kieran. People can be fooled. That's why you would need to do some research. Don't just go to the first one you hear about, look around. Contact organizations in your area. Talk to others who may have been to one. There are always risks. Personally i would ask the astrologer to deliver their interpretation of your chart without asking questions. If they have a problem with that i would be sceptical of their abilities as it would fall into the realms of cold reading. In fact if you attend any form or divination of yourself, or psychic reading as such, i would avoid answering any questions, especially ones that would help the psychic or reader "fish" for answers.
As for cold reading, i don't know that he was essentially "cold reading" the participants as say a "psychic or medium would do. As you have already pointed out, he would have compiled simple charts for each of them, and due to time constraints, made a quick assessment of that information supplied by each person: date of birth, birth time, place of birth (lat & long). He probably would have factored in the position of the planets in the various houses and also determined the ascendant sign and sign at mid heaven. I don't know whether he would have enough time to factor in the various planetary aspects as they relate to each other.
His "reading" as such would have been made using the information those factors supplied him. Having the participants in front of him when he delivered the reading is problematic in a way as their feedback may have helped him. In the end, as you say he did a pretty good job with the testing criteria supplied to him.
Astrology is far from a perfect method of divination as indeed all methods are not. I think the people who i had mentioned as having used it would have used it as an adjunct to their other methods of information gathering, just as the U.S government used remote viewing as an adjunct to its other intelligence gathering methods.
Yeah and the Shermer facial expressions were priceless.
I agree Kieran. The Vedic astrologer did a commendable job.The other test he could not have done that, because he'd not met any of the nine test subjects in person. Just to clarify to make it more clear for other people reading this. The second test my opinion and yours I guess? The guy is genuine and credible, he passed all tests put in front of him that were worth a damn. I honestly can't see how anyone can argue against the test, when the astrologer had very little to go on other then what I mentioned.