So i'm nor sure what this roasting of Vallée is about. If anything he has expressed a very deep critique of how the UFO phenomenon has been used at the deepest of levels by the PTB. His critiques, unlike the one of him up above, are not conspiratorial & grossly insulting, but in fact challenges how power manipulates the belief systems of the masses. His unwavering disdain for cultists and militarists who create such events is quite evident throughout his writings. In Revelations he openly talks about psychological operations as a likely reality in abduction cases.
Ok, for some reason are you suggesting I'm "conspiratorial and grossly insulting" ???
I want to be clear I am NOT attempting to be grossly insulting towards Vallee, but I think he is "an insider" that gets "whispered" a lot of secret and privileged information that might still be technically classified in some instances. I don't know of any conspiracy he is involved with, nor do I suggest that, but Vallee says himself that he can not publicly reveal information he knows! He says you must read "between the lines" in his books that are FICTION to understand what he is getting at.
I do NOT think he is afraid of law suits, when he is saying this. The fear is much deeper than that for sure. Imo.
He does not keep cases to himself - he prefers to investigate cases not already trampled on, but those that come to him privately and then he writes about them publicly.
Vallee definitely keeps many of his "personal interest" cases completely private and never says anything publicly about some of these. I've heard him discuss this myself.
He has supplied us with the best criticism and evolving, possible ways of thinking through the UFO phenomenon to date of any ufologist. He has exposed how ufo cover ups, plots and deception work. He is liberal with his critiques of many agencies, not in cahoots with them. His promotion of a free and open database of historical cases as evident in his last book along with the many unique ones he has investigated personally deserve more than veiled suggestions he would be a Nazi collaborator when his writing suggests otherwise.
Wholly crap, what's with the Nazi collaborator suggestions??? Now, you're being conspiratorial???
He worked on Bigelow's database that is NDA, and it's not available to the public.
As a child of World War Two who remembers its limitless horrors, my revulsion at the practices of Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib was so great that it took me a while to realize the more positive implications: if our henchmen used waterboarding, a practice so primitive it placed us in the same hateful historical imagery as the caves of the Inquisition and the cellars of the Nazi, this can only mean that all the fancy interrogation drugs developed in classified labs in the 60s and 70s have failed: there is no truth serum. We should be relieved about that."
This is a HUGE MISTAKE for Vallee to suggest this. He is mistaken. Why? The USA has sent many captured "battlefield" [and "taken"] prisoners to foreign lands where these people have been tortured "off the books" with UNKNOWN techniques that will have definitely included drugging IMO. I do not think for one second that many drug choices would have definitely been used vs water-boarding, AND this
proves, in my mind, just how naive Vallee may be to write this nonsense. He has NO IDEA what all was used, when and where, etc., but I strongly suggest he made a GROSS ERROR to suggest these drugs have failed. No way!
The water boarding is known TO FAIL, so his logic is a failure in this matter, imo. No, I don't think this is a conspiracy or cover-up with Vallee's thinking, but he made a big mistake to write that.
Vallee is fallible like all of us.