Kieran
Paranormal Adept
I would have thought you would understand the difference between what something literally says and what your (or whomever you're reading) interpretation of it might be. I also fail to understand why you would make a statement such as you made without providing some sort of reference that actually supports it. Nor do I get your inability to understand that I really don't mind how you care to interpret a given text as opposed to saying a given text says something literally when it obviously does not literally say that.
That is your interpretation. Cool! There are several others.
I pretty familiar with the idea as Jacques F. Vallee has ploughed that ground many years ago. I think you would find his books interesting.
Anyone who has actually studied the Bible (belief in its alleged divine inspiration is quite unnecessary for the task) knows that Satan and the Antichrist are two different entities, that mention of the Antichrist only occurs in the New Testament, that fallen angels are not human beings, and that the Tribe of Dan were just another human faction. Now granted, there any number of interpretations, theories, and wild speculation about these subjects from any number of people and cults. Most respectable biblical scholars or even just 'students of the Bible' would have quite a belly laugh at the notion that the Devil and the Antichrist are the same thing or that Tribe of Dan were inhuman. I've read various translations of the Bible cover to cover over the years and intensely studied the material and the various interpretations of it having taught more classes on various subjects in it than I really care to go into. I really won't waste our time by attempting to bring you up to speed and the main variants on interpreting the subject of the Antichrist. If you have an actual interest in understanding what the main stream Bible scholars vs. fringe theorists have been saying for centuries you can look that up yourself. All I'll say is that you are proposing an extremely fringe interpretation that from my knowledge of the material, cannot be justified by any literal reading of the text;it requires a lot of reading between the lines and pulling stuff out of the air to get there.
Having said all of that I reiterate that I really don't a hoot in hell how you choose to interpret the Bible. What I do care about is people making outlandish statements that are simply aren't true. I asked you provide the quotes and I knew ahead of time it would impossible for you to do so. Your citing of the Jeremiah passage was a large tell. Rather than admit that what you are talking about cannot be literally found in the Bible but is in fact your interpretation (or David Icke's or whoever) of it is somewhat puzzling but I've come to expect that sort of thing here. Just don't piss on my leg and tell me it's raining. Fair enough?
"Your so predictable i knew you would have the same argument in your newest post. Ok i apologise i should have avoided saying the Tribe of Dan are the Fallen Angels. Do you feel better now? It still does mean i am wrong in my interpration of the Bible. Afterall the Bible is open to interpretation from each Individual reader. You yourself are interprating what you have read in the Bible. You claim the "Fallen angels" are not human. I guess from the Biblical teachings you've read over the years. Correct?
Yet when you say "not Human" What do you mean specifically? You seem to think i have less of a knowledge to such subjects than you, a perception perhaps?
" The Angels are often descripted as having Human Features, let us not forget. Now do you believe?.. "The Fallen Angels were deformed creatures literally as Christen Teachings tell us? Do you believe in stories of Angelic Angels with feathers attached to their backs? If not, then we agree here.
"
I have a believe the Tribe of Dan were Human and also have a believe the Fallen Angels were Human in Apperance. So what does than mean. 'I think it means the Tribe of Dan and the Fallen Angels are one in the same "Same tribe same Race" It's my belief and i am entitled to my belief, just as you are on other subjects.
For me, the Fallen Angels and the Tribe of Dan were an advanced race in the sciences. And that is why the "Book of Revelation" Left the Tribe of Dan out and called them the Antichrist due to their pagan ways, which probably meant they were interested in the Sciences and Astronomy and medicine. Genesis and New Testment and parts of John clearly talk about the Antichrist.
You bring up Satan and Devil and you claim i have no understanding of it. Why you brought this up, is only knowen to you!!
I only said the Tribe of Dan were the Fallen Angels. The Biblical Books make the claim Dan was the Antichrist. I will explain my understanding of certain terms in Christen teachings and you probably correct me, if your understanding is not the same as mine.
Antichrist means been against Jesus Christ as being the son of God and Satan and the Devil is a term refering to a angel who rebelled against GOD for giving free will to humans plus a number of other things. That angel was Lucifer.
I tend to lose interest when someone like you lumps me with People of the calibre of David Icke. I'm speculating on issues that are historical in nature and well documented. You claim respectable Biblical scholars would laugh to some of my ideas. Who says... You
I respect Jacque Vallée But i don't need to read someonelses book to understand my own cultures stories. There is an obvious connection betweem the Ufo Phenomenon and Fairy lore of Medieval times and much earlier during the classical Age of our History. I don't need to prove that to anyone. Other people have clearly seen does clues along time ago.
---------- Post added at 08:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:55 PM ----------
I have some information that might interest some people. Lot of people here have probably heard of "William Butler Yeats? How many of ye i do not know. He was Irish poet and Dramatist and one the greatest literature writers of the 20 century. He was a believer in the Tuatha Legends. And wrote many peoms about the fairies of old Ireland. He has a different take on the tales, to me, but i his theory is very interesting. Anyway he believes
In PRE-HISTORIC Ireland, Before the establishment of Celt establishment, there existed in Ireland. One of the most Fascinating Tribes of all time Called the Tuatha de Dannan means Tribe of dan or the people of the Goddess Danu or Dana.. Yeats calls them an "Angelic clan"
According to YEATS also...medievel scribes call them "Dei TERRINI" Latin word for "Spirits of the Earth"
Yeats said they were totally human. They mixed with the local Population but they were more spirtual in nature and had more power then the ordinary population
However with the coming of Roman Christinity. The Tuatha were banished, deposed, and condemned as "Fallen Angels" According to Yeats they disappeared then into the hills, rocks., rivers and trees were according to YEATS they are still alive today.
According to Yeats Rome never invaded Ireland. Which is an historical fact. The Romans viewed Ireland as place of deep Esoteric knowledge. According to Yeats the Tuatha had four treasures they brought to Ireland long ago.. The LIA FIA stone of destiny... The Claimh solus.. Sword of light... The Cauldron of plenty and finally the spear of victory. According to many including YEATS the Cauldron of plenty is what many people today now call the Holy "Grail"