• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Philip Imbrogno Interview

Free episodes:

Did something get deleted?
Yeah, I did that.
I rediscovered the old thread and thought it was interesting that Imbrogno was defended when Kandinsky questioned his credibility. After seeing that things were mostly straightened after Imbrogno was exposed, I decided to delete my post. Sorry for the confusion.
 
Not everyone agrees that it is a historical text. Some people, like myself, have problems with the fact that everything in it was written long after the time period that any given text describes and that most people and events in it can't be found anywhere else that wasn't derived from its source documents. It's 66 books written by a wide variety of authors living in a wide variety of time periods, in different cultures about alleged events that they personally could not have witnessed. It was assembled and massaged into its present state over centuries by religious zealots with different agendas. Some may disagree from some point of faith that it is an "inspired" work, but I think anyone would be hard pressed to say what I've said about its origins is untrue. In short, its only a historical text if you place faith in the notion that it is divinely inspired. Otherwise its a collection of various myths, legends, and questionable oral histories constructed by 'believers' for 'believers.' Fortunately in this time in history everyone is free to believe what they want to about it. Sadly it hasn't always been so (the religious zealot thing again.)

Could not have said it better if I tried. Bravo!
 
Back
Top