• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

The Official Paracast Political Thread!

Forums New posts

Free episodes:

Status
Not open for further replies.
Muadib said:
Brought to you by The National Review, sponsored by such wonderful groups as the climate change denying morons that make up The Heritage Foundation.

They can totally be trusted to stick to the facts and provide a non biased opinion. LMFAO!

Face it, your candidate is going down in flames, he's outed himself as an orange faced buffoon even more so than he had previously. He's finished.

Get ready for at least 4 years of Hillary, maybe by then the GOP will be able to produce a candidate who literally isn't the scum of the Earth. People say Trumps not a politician, even though he's running for political office lol, but he's actually worse than a politician, he's a piece of garbage.
Click to expand...

"Climate denying morons" that would be you denying a normal function of the planet. Lol
Trump is a piece of garbage. Hillary is a pile of steamy crap.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
It is coming through as the T-word. Treason. One Trump campaign official was already dumped for ties to the Ukraine or Russia.
 
That's why they're circling their wagons. They've punked us and in the process have been outed.
 
Jeff Davis said:
Trump is merely the reflection of the people's passive revolution in this pathetic Oligarchic excuse for a democracy. The worse the media makes Trump out to be, the greater the chance that Trump will get the majority vote in November. We are SICK of a global elite of alpha lawyers running this awesome country's true identity into the ground
Click to expand...

Thats the key to all this imo.
Regardless of what ppl think of the candidate personally, Its what he represents that really at play.

Its very hard to poll the anti politic sentiment. we saw it in Brexit and in the recent australian elections.

The question isnt do you want a man or a woman in the WH
Do you want trump or hillary as POTUS

Its do you want more of the same or something different.

I personally cant call it, obama did a good job outlining the positives of his tenure in south carolina yesterday, But the fact that trump is a candidate says something too.

But you cant poll the anti politic sentiment. there will be a lot of people who will vote for something different, but never admit to friends and family they voted for trump

Its going to be interesting
 
Jeff Davis said:
I'm certain this will make a HUGE difference on November 8th. ROTFLMAO!!!
Click to expand...
Elections have been won or lost on fewer votes than the number of views the video has had so far.
BTW, Sam Harris is qualified at precisely one thing. Being a blow hard.
Click to expand...
With a degree in philosophy from Stanford University and a Ph.D. in neuroscience from UCLA, and seven books published, I'd have to say that your assessment is entirely inaccurate. Moreover, Harris is far from being a "blow hard". He speaks calmly with thoughtfulness about the issues. If anything it's Trump who is the blow hard.

Joe Rogan With Sam Harris On Trump

 
Last edited:
Well, when it comes to possibly starting a nuclear war, I suspect a certain individual who is being charged today with groping at least three women uninvited would get upset and possibly threaten or launch nukes.
 
Here is a bit of Common sense (Thomas Paine)

#1:
"IN the following pages I offer nothing more than simple facts, plain arguments, and common sense; and have no other preliminaries to settle with the reader, than that he will divest himself of prejudice and prepossession, and suffer his reason and his feelings to determine for themselves; that he will put on, or rather that he will not put off, the true character of a man*, and generously enlarge his views beyond the present day."


* The true Character of Trump

#2:
"The least fracture now will be like a name engraved with the point of a pin on the tender rind of a young oak; The wound will enlarge with the tree, and posterity read it in full grown characters."

I interpret #2 as saying that we should be careful about who we put in power, because it will not just affect our futures, but those of the following generations.


This all occurred to me when I watched the second debate and trump spoke negatively about "rebels", which I though would be a massive faux pas in America (given her History), but it seems to have passed everybody by.

And that's another point America is a "Motherland" people should remember that when they try to defend Trumps remarks.


When I ask my self honestly which politician would be more likely to change the American Constitution, I would say Trump is more likely, and that includes the second amendment, it is not hard for me to imagine Trump doing this to hold on to power. He seems the more likely to set the Armed forces on his own population. If you think people will be angry if trump loses, imagine their rage if he wins and it turns out that trump is in fact a Tyrant.


Someone said "Diplomacy has no place on the Battlefield" and I agree, however diplomacy can stop the war starting in the first place.
Soldiers follow orders, and those orders should come from the Government (as in the peoples democratically elected representative) the thought of living in a place where the opposite is true is an unpleasant one, but a reality in many places around the globe.
America has been there before (when it was ruled by the King of England) and is also no stranger to internal Conflict (the Civil War). As an outsider looking in: Trump seems to represent a return to those intolerant and unjust times.
 
mike said:
Thats the key to all this imo.
Regardless of what ppl think of the candidate personally, Its what he represents that really at play.

Its very hard to poll the anti politic sentiment. we saw it in Brexit and in the recent australian elections.

The question isnt do you want a man or a woman in the WH
Do you want trump or hillary as POTUS

Its do you want more of the same or something different.

I personally cant call it, obama did a good job outlining the positives of his tenure in south carolina yesterday, But the fact that trump is a candidate says something too.

But you cant poll the anti politic sentiment. there will be a lot of people who will vote for something different, but never admit to friends and family they voted for trump

Its going to be interesting
Click to expand...


Mike, you have said EXACTLY what I have already said here in this thread at least 2 or 3 times now. I do sincerely appreciate you being able to relate. It's VERY, very tough, for anyone who's immediate family has not been a citizen in this country for well over a hundred years, to truly understand where Trump's majority backing is coming from. We simply HATE the factionally entrenched establishment that has ruined this country over the course of the last 50-60 years. It's disgusting the manner in which the government has capitalized on our very own worst weaknesses. It used laziness, mediocrity, race, religion, medical care, and a total sense of creating a "drug addict like" over dependence on itself. This being to basically lower the mass standards in this country to that of a third world nation. This country's true identity in mass majority has been destroyed by this most evil of micro oligarchic hordes. All in the name of such a small controlling group's bent mission of making matters manageable here while leading the pathetic leftover masses around by that little invisible ring their noses called The Media. And what REALLY pisses us off is the fact that they have used this once great country's strengths, the real hard working and independence savvy members of it's populous, to crowd fund it's playing field leveling, power mongering, evil shenanigans.

There is no question that it will get worse for Trump, before it gets better. The MS liberal media are in fact bent on destroying him, but they will NOT succeed. The REAL majority here in this country, consisting of both liberal and conservative voters, have learned a long time ago not to trust it's lying "voice with pictures" for hire messages.

The TRUTH is, no matter how bad the media paints Trump for the gullible masses, Hillary would make him look like the Pope by a sincere comparison. That woman has been living off scorn for almost as long as she's been riding slick Willy's cocaine stained coattails, and she's one ruthless, pissed off, elitist, criminally treasonous, bitch. It's sincerely too bad that most of the novice media brainwashed liberal commentators around here won't admit as much. It's nothing more at this point in her well illuminated and proven history but denial on the part of her supporters.
 
After hearing the latest brand of accusations against Trump from several women, I find it difficult to comprehend the reality you are living in.
 
and that is all they are at this point, accusations. it doesn't surprise me at all that all this is coming out about Trump just like it did against Cosby. Some might see it as piling on or the MSM pulling out all the stops, i don't know if i agree with that as you do see this type of scenario elsewhere, that is people coming out of the woodwork. all it takes is one accusation and the flood gates open but so far all he has been CAUGHT at is making some very offensive repugnant comments about women and he apologized for that just like Hillary apologized for acid washing ;) those emails. Do i think he's guilty of these charges ? Yes just like i believe a lot of accusations aginst Hillary. i believe this because i believe where there's smoke there's fire and BOTH canidates are surronded in a hell of a lot of smoke and should be given equal consideration, but If one wants to argue that all that slander against Hillary is politically motivated then Trump should be given the same consideration. I have enough scorn for both of them but Trump is by far the bigger boob and Hillary has far more credentials. The only third I've heard Trump touch on in any detail outside of something is "It's gonna be HUGE" is taxes and or tax reform which i'm sure he knows about better than anyone. My biased feeeling is that Trump's plan will enrichen himself, Hillary's will enrichen the Clinton boosters and neither gives a fig newton about the lower middle class or african americans at least to the point of doing something for them.
 
Last edited:
A lot of what's claimed about Clinton is politically inspired, and much of it proven false or exaggerated. She's far from perfect, but some of these stories are absurd.

On the other hand, Trump's record is out there, and it all fits.
 
At any rate at this point when it comes to my presidential choice i think i really am going to have to give that section a pass and concentrate on a few other things as it is we in california have 16 state propositions including such sesmic iniatives as making porn actors wear condoms. i think i'm going to pass on that one as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top