I need a clarification here.. the mummy in the roswell slides..
Was NOT in the million dollar museum?
I haven't seen any indication that it was. But who knows?
NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
I need a clarification here.. the mummy in the roswell slides..
Was NOT in the million dollar museum?
Whitley Streiber, Jaime Maussan, and Linda Moulton Howe allege that American intelligence placed an alien body in a museum with a false placard in order to test the public's reaction.
They don't dispute what the placard says. Whitley himself was able to deblur it.
Jaime says that if the placard were unveiled prior to the event, he would have gone through with it anyway as the body itself is anomalous.
George Wingfield is much better placed than me to provide information about Armen Victorian. My interest in Armen Victorian is focused on his contact with members of the so-called Aviary since Armen Victorian was one of the first researchers to publish allegations in relation to that group. However, tracing the history of Armen Victorian's investigation backwards, it seems that George Wingfield was the one that provided relevant names to Armen Victorian. In a conference speech in Leeds in 1992, Armen Victorian mentioned (at 4 minutes 55 seconds into his presentation) that he had received a fax from George Wingfield which gave relevant names, prompting his contact with members of the Aviary (some of which he recorded, e.g. his telephone call to Ron Pandolfi of the CIA).
You guy then understand that the million dollar museum mummy and the the roswell slides mummy are not the same? Should I make a topic to discuss this 2nd mummy?
I’ve no idea whether Armen Victorian is alive or dead, in jail or out of jail, or whether or not he’s getting a pension from a whole number of intelligence agencies. In general I don’t subscribe to many conspiracy theories and tend to think that people like him and Irving and Lundberg and Schnabel are simply weirdos with a hidden agenda that may or may not be financed by the CIA or goodness knows whom.
Ok, if that's how it's goimg down then I call WalleyeWith all due respect, Isaac, I have to ask whether –in view of your name—you too are a member of the Aquarium?
Try saying CIA Satanic Scientologist really fast ten times, as they easily have ten times that amount.P.S. Aquarium members Dan and Rosemary told me in all earnest back then that several CIA men they knew were scientologists and that there was one guy rumored to be a practicing Satanist.
But if the majority of what he is stringing together in his personal inventions and reinventions is about myth making, given his title, then at the we very least we should question his results.Hmm, beginning to wonder whether anyone over there in that timeframe knew who was who or what was up. You don't seem to want to talk frankly about it, and I'm losing interest in it again anyway.
Except in Victorian. Have you read his many articles and his book on the development of CIA and military mind-control projects and related subjects, heavily based in FOIA-obtained information? What intelligence agencies do you think would pay him for this? I can't put him a category with the Mirage Men given that work and don't see how you can.
given his title,
The title of 'mythologist.' If this movie is a mini theses opening up to his larger examinations of Ostension at work then the blueprints are being laid down in that movie. Doty and Victorian are just an expression of the duality of ufological mythology, each busy mining and seeding their sides of the tracks for not too dissimilar purposes.Which title are you referring to?
Do those who are workmanlike adopt a series of various pseudonyms or perhaps he is workmanlike across his many identities? As an orchid thief he appears to be quite a diligent individual. However, he is definitely a slippery character, adopting different personas and purporting various types of information - not all appears to be just what we have on the surface. There is a strong degree of invention associated with this individual and as with Doty, one should not always believe everything that is presented just because it's dressed in factual appearances. Lundberg would not have embarked on the project with Victorian at the centre of it if he was not a bit of a magician, in the way that Doty also can deceive and manage perceptions of others.If by 'he' you mean Victorian, what do you identify as his personal inventions and mythmaking? From what I've read of his published papers they seem to be very workmanlike presentations of researched information concerning governmental/military mind-control programs that were also ultimately disclosed in the press.
Do those who are workmanlike adopt a series of various pseudonyms or perhaps he is workmanlike across his many identities?
As an orchid thief he appears to be quite a diligent individual. However, he is definitely a slippery character, adopting different personas and purporting various types of information - not all appears to be just what we have on the surface. There is a strong degree of invention associated with this individual and as with Doty, one should not always believe everything that is presented just because it's dressed in factual appearances. Lundberg would not have embarked on the project with Victorian at the centre of it if he was not a bit of a magician, in the way that Doty also can deceive and manage perceptions of others.
I used the term 'workmanlike' to refer to the style and content of Victorian's written presentations of evidence gathered from his FOIA and other research into various mind-control technologies being developed and planned by the PTB out of public sight. He was not the only individual conducting such investigations, and others involved in that effort have referred to his work. In fact, Vallee cites some of his work in the notes to one of his books I was reading last night at Google Books. Were it not the case that what Victorian and others uncovered was later disclosed by serious journalists in major newspapers, one might try to dismiss AV as a 'conspiracy theorist' (as if conspiracies don't exist among the PTB), but his writings do not read like or sound like conspiracy-mongering. In fact they are not. Read them in detail, down through he footnotes, and you will see what I mean.
Re his use of pseudonyms, it's clear that he used them in trying to extract information by telephone from individuals involved in the above activities and other activities such as disinformation concerning ufos and crop circles (e.g., his questions posed to Schnabel and Irving). His goals, aside from his involvement in illegal orchid-trading, appear to have been furthering what he considered to be the public interest, exposing unconscionable activities in hidden mind-control and psychotronic programs of the PTB and also in disinformation and perception management concerning ufos and other anomalous phenomena. Even we, who discuss the latter subjects casually on the internet, often use pseudonyms. Are we all 'slippery characters'?
As "an orchid thief" Azerzhedal no doubt broke the law, probably to support himself and his family. He was more than likely not being paid by CIA and other agencies to reveal their activities in mind-control technologies and disinformation. He also seems to have failed to pay his telephone bill for many years. He did end up in court on both complaints, and so far as I have been able to learn was jailed for about six weeks following the hearing that Irving 'describes' in his own inimitable way. If you want to make a case that he was a disinformation agent like Doty, I'll be happy to read it.
Are you referring to Smith & Rosemary Guily (weren't they a couple at one time?) and is the satanist Michael Aquino?Aquarium members Dan and Rosemary told me in all earnest back then that several CIA men they knew were scientologists and that there was one guy rumored to be a practicing Satanist.
Thanks for spelling out your current beliefs, George. It seems you've become a true blue American(ized) patriot. What might be helpful, for anyone who wants to understand why, would be an autobiographical essay recounting the evidentiary revelations you've experienced that support your current thinking, a kind of bildungsroman following your education in recent years. I'm not asking that you write such an essay, though if you published one here I would read it.