• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Ancient knowledge, lost or censored ?

Free episodes:

I have a couple of close friends who are/were teachers and getting them to think outside the covers of their textbooks is impossible. They have spent their entire lives living lies, teaching lies, regurgitating the tyrannical Elite views (of history, economics, materialistic physics, et al).

Looking at the Giza Pyramids engineering, construction, pre-historic possibilities takes a clean, unbiased mind one free and clear of prior indoctrination. If you don't have one, you will be lost in a sea of repetitive, ridiculous skepticism.

So you have no biases? You would be the first person ever.
 

That was a bullshit presentation. It was nothing but continued blathering. Kim you said you KNEW how the pyramids were built.

 
... you said you KNEW how the pyramids were built.

I don't know about anyone else, but I am convinced beyond any shadow of a doubt that human beings made the pyramids using tools and mathematics. Exactly how they did it and why would be nice to know but I am not putting much money on the notion that anyone alive today is going to be able to tell me. Somebody with real pull said "Build it." and somebody with some brains set about to it a long, long, time ago. Whatever its true purpose was in the past, it is a useless pile of rocks now.
 
I have a couple of close friends who are/were teachers and getting them to think outside the covers of their textbooks is impossible. They have spent their entire lives living lies, teaching lies, regurgitating the tyrannical Elite views (of history, economics, materialistic physics, et al).

Looking at the Giza Pyramids engineering, construction, pre-historic possibilities takes a clean, unbiased mind one free and clear of prior indoctrination. If you don't have one, you will be lost in a sea of repetitive, ridiculous skepticism.

Wow. That's quite a mouthful of venom.:D

And those teachers were your "close friends"? Are they still? Have you brought them to your state of "unbiased mind," "free and clear of prior indoctrination," and "thinking outside the covers of their textbooks"?

I taught for 35 years, two years overseas. I have taught history, Latin, English, algebra, and geometry, as well more subjects I could name, at every grade level encompassed by grades three through twelve. I also have had a lifelong interest in science, religion, history, psychology, and the confluence of these and more. I know I come across as pedantic on the forum, but I don't apologize for it. I have recommended a lot of books. I think, though I may be on the ignore list of one, and very recently acquired that honor from another just this very morning, that I stick to the evidence of whatever I discuss, and have admitted when what I believe has no empirical evidence.

Your description of teachers is very strongly worded, and leaves you open to many questions as to specifics, specifics being the thing that seems to infuriate a few members here, but I will ask for some from you. To wit:

1. What did your friends teach, and at what grade level?
2. In what, very specific mind you, ways were they resistant to "think[ing] outside the covers of their textbooks"?
3. You say they "spent their entire lives living lies." What lies, specifically, were they living? And you seem to imply lies outside the classroom, so specific, please.
4. They spent, you say, "their entire lives teaching lies." What, specifically, were those lies? Why, exactly, were they lies? You have to be specific.
5. They spent, you say, "their entire lives regurgitating the tyrannical Elite views of history." You explained the history one a bit, but more specifics, more cultures, more structures, more of these "pre-historic possibilities," would be helpful for me to understand exactly what periods, peoples, structures, etc. you view as "tryannical[ly]" held by this "Elite" with a capital E.
6. Same quote as #5, same request for specifics regarding "economics."
7. Same quote, same request for specifics regarding "materialistic physics." What, exactly, first of all, is "materialistic" physics?
8. I know what the abbreviation et al means in Latin, so please continue with the list of other fields or subjects you view as being "tyrannical[ly]" influenced by this "Elite."

These specifics would be intriguing to discuss in detail. But, again, specifics. Kim;)
 
by the way, i was a landscaper for 8 years and a heavy equipment operator for about 20 years so i know how to level dirt and foundations.


I remember seeing something many years ago where they demonstrated using water. I don't remember the details.

Given you have experience, how would you level 13 acres without modern machinery? You wouldn't do the entire space at once would you but rather in some incremental fashion, an acre or less at a time right?
 
Maybe you missed my post where I clearly stated that I don't read thesis-styled, multi-paragraphed replies. Especially when authored by demogogic dogmatics. FYI.
 
I don't know about anyone else, but I am convinced beyond any shadow of a doubt that human beings made the pyramids using tools and mathematics. Exactly how they did it and why would be nice to know but I am not putting much money on the notion that anyone alive today is going to be able to tell me. Somebody with real pull said "Build it." and somebody with some brains set about to it a long, long, time ago. Whatever its true purpose was in the past, it is a useless pile of rocks now.

Maybe a pile of exquisitely machined megaslabs temporarily out of practical use perhaps?

When the Builders let us know, we will know. Maybe they left the clues but we're too quantum entangled to see them? Or materialistic scientific? Or just stupid as shit.

Whoever it was is one whole hell of a lot smarter than we are relatively.
 
i probably would have used water. i just used water and a garden hose this weekend to set the height of 4 x 4 x 10 foot posts in my yard.
 
Whoever it was is one whole hell of a lot smarter than we are relatively.

I wouldn't necessarily say that. One of my major problems with the "human's didn't do it" theories of pyramids or crop circles is that it generally ignores the body of human accomplishment and denigrates humans unnecessarily. The ancient humans were obviously smart and industrious or we wouldn't be here now. I'm willing to bet the species that built the pyramids or any other structure you want to name is the same one that created the Panama canal, put objects in orbit around other celestial bodies, and walked on the moon. They are a smart bunch about some things and have been around as long as we can remember.
 
Here are two links that need to be read in their entirety and carefully and that will answer that and other questions much more fully and clearly. :)

Be prepared, however, to make yourself be patient, and give yourself time to click on other links within these and read what is presented there.

It's fun, and not a trip down the rabbit hole, but into real evidence about the leveling, alignment, etc. I've also posted a few other links in my other posts on this topic. While that is not my metier to just post videos and links, there are sites on the web that do allow you with some perseverance to answer your own questions. These are actually very readable and not too complicated at all, and just fascinating.

Survey and the alignment of the Khufu pyramid - ancient Egyptian techniques

Egypt: Construction of the Pyramids, Part I: Orientation and Layout and the Pyramid Platform

Kim:)
 
Wow. That's quite a mouthful of venom.:D

And those teachers were your "close friends"? Are they still? Have you brought them to your state of "unbiased mind," "free and clear of prior indoctrination," and "thinking outside the covers of their textbooks"?

I taught for 35 years, two years overseas. I have taught history, Latin, English, algebra, and geometry, as well more subjects I could name, at every grade level encompassed by grades three through twelve. I also have had a lifelong interest in science, religion, history, psychology, and the confluence of these and more. I know I come across as pedantic on the forum, but I don't apologize for it. I have recommended a lot of books. I think, though I may be on the ignore list of one, and very recently acquired that honor from another just this very morning, that I stick to the evidence of whatever I discuss, and have admitted when what I believe has no empirical evidence.

Your description of teachers is very strongly worded, and leaves you open to many questions as to specifics, specifics being the thing that seems to infuriate a few members here, but I will ask for some from you. To wit:

1. What did your friends teach, and at what grade level?
2. In what, very specific mind you, ways were they resistant to "think[ing] outside the covers of their textbooks"?
3. You say they "spent their entire lives living lies." What lies, specifically, were they living? And you seem to imply lies outside the classroom, so specific, please.
4. They spent, you say, "their entire lives teaching lies." What, specifically, were those lies? Why, exactly, were they lies? You have to be specific.
5. They spent, you say, "their entire lives regurgitating the tyrannical Elite views of history." You explained the history one a bit, but more specifics, more cultures, more structures, more of these "pre-historic possibilities," would be helpful for me to understand exactly what periods, peoples, structures, etc. you view as "tryannical[ly]" held by this "Elite" with a capital E.
6. Same quote as #5, same request for specifics regarding "economics."
7. Same quote, same request for specifics regarding "materialistic physics." What, exactly, first of all, is "materialistic" physics?
8. I know what the abbreviation et al means in Latin, so please continue with the list of other fields or subjects you view as being "tyrannical[ly]" influenced by this "Elite."

These specifics would be intriguing to discuss in detail. But, again, specifics. Kim;)
BLAH BLAH BLAH... More blather... when are we ever going to hear how the pyramids were built and what tools they used?!?
 
what?! more links? you said YOU KNEW how they built the pyramids and you go and post more links.
 
not much of a teacher are you... here you go class, read this and just believe me that it is true.... (just like the bible)
 
Maybe you missed my post where I clearly stated that I don't read thesis-styled, multi-paragraphed replies. Especially when authored by demogogic dogmatics. FYI.

Ok, sorry, didn't mean to offend you. It's just that when you said all that stuff about teachers, it was pretty, well, way out there.

You made some very specific observations, rather strongly, about teachers,

So, just asked for specifics, point by point, of your contentions.

Sorry if that made you angry, to be asked to simply supply specifics. Kim:D
 
I wouldn't necessarily say that. One of my major problems with the "human's didn't do it" theories of pyramids or crop circles is that it generally ignores the body of human accomplishment and denigrates humans unnecessarily. The ancient humans were obviously smart and industrious or we wouldn't be here now. I'm willing to bet the species that built the pyramids or any other structure you want to name is the same one that created the Panama canal, put objects in orbit around other celestial bodies, and walked on the moon. They are a smart bunch about some things and have been around as long as we can remember.

I suppose you missed the term "relatively" as in relative to their times and our times.
 
Well, Pixel, you didn't give an exactly clear explanation of how you set the height of those posts using water. I'm not saying you didn't do it, and do it well, but could you give me a step by step description of how water was used, exactly, to set the heights of the posts? Thanks. Kim:)
i probably would have used water. i just used water and a garden hose this weekend to set the height of 4 x 4 x 10 foot posts in my yard.
 
Back
Top