He Who Shall Not Be Named? & The Billy Meier Contacts
Recently I had a discussion with a person supporting the Meier case on another forum and I offered him the following theory on Meier's "weddingcake" UFO and more specificly the 'spheres' on the alleged craft. I appreciate any feedback in order to see if my theory is flawed or incomplete.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were the one hinting towards the spheres on the WC UFO
providing some sort of authenticity. While you whisk my
opinion away as irrelevant without going into any detail, let
me explain my position.
As you know very well the alleged WC UFO photographed by
Billy Meier has many spherical objects. The spheres themselves
reflect the background and mirror it. No argument so far I
presume? Lets have a look at the spheres in detail.
http://thebiggestsecretpict.online.fr/ufo/weddingcake_spheres_reflection.jpg
What's unusual here JP? I admit that the resolution is poor and
subsequently hampers any direct conclusions, however the
poor resolution is a hint in itself. Within the spheres we see a
reflection. The lower half of the spheres reflects the 'rim' of
the WC UFO. The upper half reflects the scenery beyond the
rim. No argument so far I presume?
What does the upper half of the spheres reflect JP?
http://thebiggestsecretpict.online.fr/ufo/Wedding_Cake_C_spheres.jpg
To be honest and objective I can't make it out clearly. There is a
rounded figure of some sort, if I didn't know any better it looks like
someones head but like I stated before, it's inconclusive.
What it doesn't show is an angular structure like a house or any
other construction which do tend to show up in the reflection of
spheres provided they are centered;
http://thebiggestsecretpict.online.fr/ufo/sphere_cropped_L.jpg
There is an exception I think which also ties in with the poor resolution
of the spheres which I mentioned in the paragraph above.
On Deardorff's site and analysis of the WC UFO (where you also
contributed) a diagram is shown which shows the position of the
photographer and the position of the alleged UFO.
The Wedding Cake UFOs
While Deardorff isn't sure what kind of diameter the UFO has the
general consensus is that we are dealing here with a diameter of
3.5 meters although nontheless 4 types with different diameters
are mentioned as being possible!
Deardorff states that Meier had his back to the carriage house.
Let me ask you a sincere question. Why isn't the house the most
dominant figure in the reflection of the spheres? Meier is standing
relatively close to it, right? If you scroll down to fig 4. on
Deardorff's site you'll notice that the carriage house is a fairly
high structure. It should have dominated the reflection in the
spheres, and it doesn't.
http://thebiggestsecretpict.online.fr/ufo/Wedding_Cake_C_spheres.jpg
There are plenty of open spaces in the reflection of the spheres
as you can see.
Even high structures can be reasonably reflected back within the
spheres and in the next picture the photographer is some distance
away from the houses in the background.
http://thebiggestsecretpict.online.fr/ufo/purple_sphere_mirror.jpg
Why don't we see that in the spheres of the alleged UFO taken by
Meier?
There is a very reasonable and plausible explanation for that and
it also addresses the poor resolution in the spheres and the limited
background.
SIZE MATTERS!
The bigger the sphere, the more resolution and detail of background.
The smaller the sphere, the less resolution and detail of background.
It's simply about size.
Have a look at the next picture.
http://thebiggestsecretpict.online.fr/ufo/magicalgarden_com_globegroup.jpg
The big spheres in the picture offer more detail then the smaller ones.
The tiny sphere in the middle and on the foreground offers practically
no detail. You have your answer right there.
You and Deardorff claim Meier's WC UFO is a large craft. That would
mean the spheres also should be of considerable size. If so, then
they should offer some detail, which they don't!
Most plausible explanation? The spheres are tiny. Less then an inch
wide. That in turn would mean the alleged UFO isn't as large as
Deardorff and you claim it to be. In fact, it supports the notion that
Meier's UFO is a model and a fake.
Now JP, please feel free to share this with others. I also await your
reply and hopefully you can offer reasonable and logical counter
arguments.
Regards,
TerraX