@Han
Look everyone this guy gets it and he is being very logical. huh imagine that using logic as derived by the laws of cause and effect to make prophesy about future events.
Of course in Han's example he is the fulcrum and therefor the gate keep of his future events. Meier is far more advanced in his understanding and doesn't mention himself in these future events. Big difference in what Han's has predicted and prophesied vs what Billy has.
@Wade Ridsdale
How many viruses on Earth?
The part in red is what I highlighted. "Strawman" anyone?
Here is an idea why don't you write down one of the 300,000+ viruses and predict what is going to make headlines with an out in the next so many years.
You will either see the truth here or you won't.
You can have the effect in your hand but it doesn't mean that you understand the laws by which the effect was derived.
That is okay, It is what the book says if you want to argue with it or marginalize it, it doesn't' matter, because the book cannot be changed
Only your judgement of it can be changed.
The "copyright" wont change and neither will the word "Ebola" you on the other hand will eventually come to see things clearly or not.
About the AIDs no one is praising him for that but if I were you I might go and research if this is Meier's first documentation on the disease.
Aside from that the article in the NY TIMES is awesome and it doesn't take anything away from Meier it just goes to show that their are other thinking humans on this planet.
And if the NY TIMES author was wrong then Meier would also be wrong and you could say look they are full of shit but you cant because sadly they were both right.
I don't know why people think that Meier is some sort of "guru", "savior", "cult leader", "holy man", etc, etc, he is not.
I haven ever met him and perhaps I will never meet him.
He is a human being like everyone working his way through life like everyone else.
He demand nothing from anybody the way he rights is very advanced and well thought out from the figu forum :
If you read carefully in many of BEAM’s writings he purposively leaves
“dis-jointed” sentences to be connected approperly by each material
human being in accordance to their own unique set of attributes and
circumstances to be arrived at their own free will so that such
connections are deemed humanely logical in function to their own
internal and external environments. What may be logically defined
accordingly to my own set of attributes based on spirit-form
evolution, quality of storage bank information, self-discipline of
material consciousness, psyche, both internal and external
environments and other factors is quite different from your set of
attributes.
For me this is something to ponder on.
Thanks