"Those manufacturing jobs aren't coming back. For a simple reason: your workforce is too expensive for them to. Are you actually going to buy american when you walk into Walmart? No. Why? Because your workforce can't or won't spend the money to buy american.
Which by this point is actually lower quality anyway than the cheaper offshore manufacturing.
A workforce that is increasingly trapped at working in service industries like Walmart
Please stop playing the bait and switch game because it will not work. What you stated here is entirely, from the ground up, bullshit.
1.) No, current manufacturing in the USA does NOT yield lower quality products, that are all more predictably expensive, than those coming from offshore middlemen brand name manufactures. I know that's completely false because I see the opposite EVERYDAY.
2.) No, the USA's manufacturing workforce is NOT trapped into working at Walmart, which is NOT a service industry, but rather a
multinational corporate retail business.
3.) Currently, manufacturing in the USA is on the
RISE, not the decline. Our workforce is NOT too expensive anymore than it ever has been. However, it is true that many of the American originated brand name owners, often having been purchased up by greedy secondary corporate conglomerate business investors whose survival strategies focus solely on increased profits as a direct result of lowered over seas production costs, will not be able to reestablish manufacturing in the USA and still survive. It kind of makes sense for them to gripe about Trump wanting to nix more so liberal trade arrangements. Too bad! They should have not created such a greed centered business model in the first place. There will be 10 new hungry USA based manufactures to take their place, for every 1 second and third party corporate middleman investment shill that takes a dump because of trade agreements.
What did I just read in the financial post this morning?
Key US companies say manufacturing jobs aren't coming back even with tariffs because of labor costs.
Until technology evolves to where labour isn't really part of the equation.
PressReader.com - Connecting People Through News
I seem to recall saying the exact same thing, and being told I'm wrong because of magical thinking.
Smoke in mirrors. See #3.) above, and at least attempt to wrap your seemingly American business success hating head around
THIS. Please pay
special attention to this.
And Trump, a billionaire who made his money by making bad deals, bankrupting himself, and illegal labour, isn't part of the NWO?
Trump is the merger between the corporations and the government.
It's kinda what's fascism is.
Good grief. Could you please substantiate this last post's claims apart from Trump being a Billionaire? No one gets to be a "Billionaire" by being an all bad businessman. That's silly, and so is the accusing him of illegally profiting. Unless of course you do have actual evidence to the contrary. The same can be said for the notion of Trump being a merger between corporations and the government. Ever heard of the term "Lobbying"? Apparently you are unfamiliar with the concept, because the fact is that the United States Government has been no less than a bought and paid for regulating strong arm extended to top corporations around the globe for the last 4 or 5 decades. However, and the self impressed liberals would love it if everyone believed otherwise, this is precisely what is UNPRECEDENTED about Trump as president. He is the first president that the USA has had in forever that isn't just another professional political puppet "on the take" like the usual run of the mill political parasites are.
Fascism is just a commonly misused word that liberals use when anyone other than themselves take control of the white house. This business of a healthy sense of nationalism as being bad or wrong is just plain sick and in fact denies a logical sense of identity. The only people that feel differently are people that take pride in demeaning themselves. They desire to be generic and as irresponsible as possible by relying on the government to take care of them. To me that just seems pathetic and completely without any true sense of liberty. Where is real freedom to be found in such an arrangement of minimums apart from a pretentious adulation of self and utter fantasy? It's illogical really, by denying basic human instinct.
Talking into the mirror again?
