kanakaris
Paranormal Adept
Is that the same Sam Harris who refuses to critize the Israeli killings in Gaza ?Sam Harris On The Election Outcome
NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
Is that the same Sam Harris who refuses to critize the Israeli killings in Gaza ?Sam Harris On The Election Outcome
Interesting back story to the kid holding the severed head...
How do you deal with this mindset ?
His wife was an ordinary aussie woman before she met him and converted to Islam. What is it about exposure to this ideology that can have such a toxic effect ?
We dont want our own home grown Jihadis back here, is it any wonder people are shy about importing more islamic people
Is it any wonder Trump made such milage out of the anti Islam promises ?
Could this really devolve into civil war ?
Yeah, and do you recall all the ailments Kennedy hit from us?Yep, he's one big bloated mess. Probably the healthiest president we've had since Kennedy.
All propaganda has to be popular and has to accommodate itself to the comprehension of the least intelligent of those whom it seeks to reach.
I’ve never read these quotes before, but this one in particular speaks to me.
I don't think so [civil war], I think if clinton won it was a remote possibility, but with Trump winning I think that ship has sailed thankfully.
Lets be Honest the lefty liberals or whatever you want to call them, couldn't even stop a clown like trump winning the election, and without the backing of the Armed forces an armed insurrection would not stand a chance.
]I think there will be small skirmishes and certainly bloodshed and violence, but not a full scale "civil war".
Trump was democratically elected, that is the bottom line, people are free to question or disagree, but violence can not be condoned.
As it may turn out Clinton will have won the popular election by over 2 million votes. The 'lefty liberals or whatever' have been denied by the electoral college system.
NY Times Op-Ed ...BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH
You're on those numbers like a pit bull on a pork chop.Trump had 59,535,522. That difference of 219,762 is razor-thin considering the nearly 120 million votes counted so far. The totals will continue to change as absentee votes trickle in."
Remember, this win is not a mandate, as mandates go. The margins in several key states were almost razor thin, a few tens of thousands or such. It could have just as easily gone the other way.
As we have seen on this thread there are posters who cannot argue without using demeaning words as counter to another person's ideas. Not only are the ideas denigrated but the person themselves - and I suspect were this forum to allow genuinely foul language that is about all we'd be hearing. That's anger - that's not 'just words' ('you cry baby')I think one thing this thread has shown, or maybe reminded me about how different people define "violence".
I would argue that language can be used in a violent way, and the pain that can be inflicted very real. Words can and do hurt.
We have 4 years to 'prepare' while he potentially guts the system. Sadly, the ultimate con artist has conned those good people (and many, many of them are good people) who voted for him thinking 'I'll set aside these words and those personal actions of his' because [fill in the blank] - you couldn't 'set aside' all that, though. All that showed who and what he is. The US has been Trumped.This is a time of opportunity, President Trump has the opportunity to show that all the bad things said about him are wrong, and the people who don't want him as president, have four years to prepare to get someone they want in the Whitehouse.
This is rhetoric. @Han if this was an election based on policies, I would agree - but it hasn't been - or one significant slice of it hasn't been. That slice is non-negotiable.I don't think either side covered themselves in glory during the campaign, but its done now, so it is time to work together and put differences aside. And by this I mean BOTH sides have to compromise.