• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

August 2, 2015 — Margie Kay

Forums New posts

Free episodes:

That show was clanger and could not help cringing listening to this one and the after episode was excellent which worth paying for. Maybe a great guest like Dr (LtCol rtd) Randle Don Ecker and Art Bell discussing the paranormal and the political history with you two great hosts.
 
I, for my part, have forwarded Margie the BMUFOR website - their comprehensive analysis debunking Meier's space and time travel photos and prophecies/predictions. She responded as follows:

"Hello Jack,
I just finished reviewing your information and links as well as other evidence submitted to me by other people and have come to the conclusion that this case must indeed be a hoax.
Thank you for the information."

And when asked what her decision regarding Michael Horn's event, she responded as follows:

"I have cancelled the event, and he may sue me over it. "

And most of us know how Michael Horn reacts to this embarrassment! Use this as "Evidence" supporting Meier case :p..
MUFON, UFOCI Force Cancellation of Billy Meier UFO Case Event!
 
Jack Nathaniel said:
I, for my part, have forwarded Margie the BMUFOR website - their comprehensive analysis debunking Meier's space and time travel photos and prophecies/predictions. She responded as follows:

"Hello Jack,
I just finished reviewing your information and links as well as other evidence submitted to me by other people and have come to the conclusion that this case must indeed be a hoax.
Thank you for the information."

And when asked what her decision regarding Michael Horn's event, she responded as follows:

"I have cancelled the event, and he may sue me over it. "

And most of us know how Michael Horn reacts to this embarrassment! Use this as "Evidence" supporting Meier case :p..
MUFON, UFOCI Force Cancellation of Billy Meier UFO Case Event!
Click to expand...
It turns out that she has integrity after all.
 
Gene Steinberg said:
Good news.

We are mentioning this in our episode with Micah Hanks.
Click to expand...

Gene, it seems that Margie is responding differently to different people. Perhaps she is trying to be diplomatic.

Following is a correspondence between a Meierite and Margie on Aug 7:

"Hello Margie,
As a regular of most things worthy of attention within the so called field of ‘ufology’, It strikes me as odd that Billy Meier’s ‘case’ is threatening enough that Michael Horn cannot even present it at the Un-X Tour? What is it that has allowed this unique opportunity to vanish?
If in fact Billy Meier is in contact with humans from the depths of the cosmos would it not entail one of the most, if not the most compelling story in all of memorable history? And yes, obviously there are some things within this case that have become focal points of speculation for many whom have not looked closer. This ‘case’ is fraught with people trying to bend the truth of it at every angle and corner, with as minimal amount of time and effort put in!
As someone whom has independently investigated it for over ten years, I just don’t see what is so threatening? Is it the length of these encounters of Billy Meiers, 70+years and still going? The evidence, a thousand+ pictures, 20+ videos, crop-light-snow circles, finger-foot prints, hundreds of eyewitnesses, private investigators that DID go to Switzerland in the 70’s to present and found no evidence of a hoax from the one armed, rural Swiss family man driving around on his moped. Taking pictures and videos of things only possible with technology available decades later? Lest I regress into only a small fraction of the evidence beyond the many thousands of pages of information that also reflects the reality of our world.
One would think, non the less that the mutual UFO network would be more willing to look into things with time, evidence, witnesses to back it up, for ones. How can an organization(be it non profit or not) ignore and suppress something it apparently is looking forward to investigating? As it seem per the director of MUFON endorsing the Billy Meier case while its many state representatives still have no clue of it? So again as much as I don’t understand I just wonder why an organization apparently looking for evidence and cases to propel the entire reason for its existence, would ignore one such as Billy Meier’s?
Thank you,
Phil B."

And Margie responded as follows:

"Hello Phil,

The events main sponsor is Un-X News, not MUFON. The reason the event was cancelled was due to lack of adequate ticket sales. If the sales are not there, we can’t put on an event. We may bring him out on another date.

Sincerely,
Margie Kay"

And here is her response to Michael Horn:

“Well, everyone is coming out of the woodwork to attack me for scheduling you to speak at our event. I had no idea that you were so controversial. Radio talk show hosts, MUFON state directors, investigators, everyone is blowing their gasket!…"

“Unfortunately, I am going to have to cancel this event on the 14th. The case is just too controversial and it has caused me some severe issues with my association with MUFON and other groups…”

Source: MUFON, UFOCI Force Cancellation of Billy Meier UFO Case Event!
 
I'm really surprised someone in Ufology doesn't know about Billy Meier and Michael Horn. It sounds like she needed to remote view Michael Horn, not Billy Meier. I don't see Billy Meier speaking anywhere.
 
Maybe Margie is right on both counts. If they've withdrawn tickets from sale, they won't be selling many. :)

At the very least, from Margie's reply to Michael Horn, the lady is not across the issues, which begs the question, how rigourous is her research?

I do think though that Margie comes across more as a well-intentioned-if-a-bit-light-on-substance True Believer than a Linda Moulton Howe kind of figure.
 
Back
Top