ALPHA ROMEO UNIFORM
Whittingham
Both sides are guilty and unless you knock all the politicians heads together nothing will never get fix simple.
NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
You just dont WANT to get it, do you Mike, to be considered a civilized democracy in this day and age, you cannot 'defend' yourself in such a murderous, and brutal way.
Targeting civilians to demoralise them, are war crimes NOW.
It is no acceptable to any right thinking civilised human being it is 2014 Mike.
And before you point to Europe, those are fledgeling democracie's, and that's being kind.
Operation Chastise
was an attack on German dams carried out on 16–17 May 1943 by Royal Air Force No. 617 Squadron, subsequently publicised as the "Dam Busters",[1] using a specially developed "bouncing bomb" invented and developed by Barnes Wallis. The Möhne and Edersee Dams were breached, causing catastrophic flooding of the Ruhr valley and of villages in the Eder valley; the Sorpe dam sustained only minor damage. Two hydroelectric power stations were destroyed and several more were damaged. Factories and mines were also either damaged or destroyed. An estimated 1,600 people drowned.
"Violence never brings permanent peace. It solves no social problem: it merely creates new and more complicated ones. Violence is impractical because it is a descending spiral ending in destruction for all. It is immoral because it seeks to humiliate the opponent rather than win his understanding: it seeks to annihilate rather than convert. Violence is immoral because it thrives on hatred rather than love. It destroys community and makes brotherhood impossible. It leaves society in monologue rather than dialogue. Violence ends up defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
How can you make peace with a neighbour who occupies your land , 600 000 settlers and counting in the West Bank ?Back in 2005, after Israel removed every soldier and settler from Gaza, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas announced that “from this day forward, there will be no security turmoil and weapons chaos and abductions, which are not characteristic of our culture.” He proved a poor prognosticator regarding Palestinian culture: given the chance to live “side by side in peace and security” with Israel, the Palestinians demonstrated they could not do so even with themselves.
They demand recognition of a Palestinian state while refusing to recognize a Jewish one; and he now seeks admission to the UN as a non-member state even though “Palestine” meets none of the four requirements under international law for a state.
When you refuse to negotiate a defined territory (and demand instead that it be conceded before you deign to “negotiate”); when you lack a government that controls your purported territory (and instead have multiple regimes each lacking legitimacy); when you lack the capacity to enter into relations with other states (and ignore the agreements you already signed); and when you have residents who reject permanent residence and assert instead a “right” to “return” to another state, you meet none of the requirements for a state.
“Palestine” Does Not Qualify as a “State” « Commentary Magazine
How can you make peace with a neigbour who does not want it ?
How can you make peace with a neighbour who occupies your land , 600 000 settlers and counting in the West Bank ?
A Terrible Normality: The Massacres and Aberrations of HistoryYou should ask the Native Americans that. 300 million+ and counting.
This thread is extremely painful to peruse as there's very little pursuit of the excluded middle and is mostly a war of words. But as what continues is the rhetoric of Islam as evil I would like to remind us of other moments of historical butchery like the inquisition, the torture of non-believers throughout all of imperialist Christendom, the witch hunts and the general subjugation of women as defined by the laws of the western land at the time.A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
– Sir Winston Churchill
British Conservative politician and statesman of the United Kingdom
He (Muhammad) poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. The essence of his doctrine was violence and lust: to exalt the brutal over the spiritual part of human nature..
– John Quincy Adams
6th president of the United States
We saw this barbarity in the old testament, later we saw it in the inqusition, but only in Islam do we see this Bullshit in the 21st century as institutionalised ideology sanctioned reality.
If you support Islam you support slavery, because its intrinsic to its priciples as Mr Churchill so rightly recognised...
This thread is extremely painful to peruse as there's very little pursuit of the excluded middle and is mostly a war of words. But as what continues is the rhetoric of Islam as evil I would like to remind us of other moments of historical butchery like the inquisition, the torture of non-believers throughout all of imperialist Christendom, the witch hunts and the general subjugation of women as defined by the laws of the western land at the time.
Again, Mike, it wasn't too long ago that in the same country of the PM you quoted despising Islam for its ownership of women it had its own national laws that identified women as chattels, or the property of a man. They had no status whatsoever and so the culture of the west that you are promoting and upholding as somehow morally superior was really guilty of the same bizarre approaches towards women as we see in the east.
No one culture is backward and all cultures ultimately will evolve out of the patriarchal violence that defined them through their laws, attitudes and religions.
It's a discriminatory position, and I find the entire, relentless approach to demonizing Islam as somehow backwards or morally retrograde to be preposterous and as hate filled as some of the many racist and discriminatory characterizations of Muslims in this thread. Many religions have a hate filled, murderous past. There are many nations whose laws are inequitable, antiquated and evil.
Re: where's the response to 'other' global ills?
No one culture owns a moral position on equality. Some cultures are still steeped in patriarchal and tribal orientations that are purely about maintaining male power i.e. Sharia law, female dowries and female castration. All cultures ultimately evolve towards gender equity and that changes everything. But you can't compare apples and oranges.
Cultures do not evolve at the same pace and can not be compared in the way you are asserting. However the countries that the west supports i.e. Israel is expected to be held to a higher standard because we expect them to be more in line with the values of their sponsors. So to ask where the outrage is just doesn't make any sense. Our outrage is tinted by our own lenses, and means nothing to a culture that has its own trajectory and unique history. What about human rights in China, North Korea, Rwanda, or how about child sex tourism or marrying 8 year olds who might die on their wedding night?
There's lots of male evil the whole world round. Targeting Muslims as a primary source of the same social ills practiced by other cultures in the past, or currently, is just a bad argument and reveals other ideologies instead.
I know that the sensationalist scenes of Muslims screaming in the streets over films about their god are shocking, and perhaps Monty Python never stimulated Catholics to call for beheading, but these conflicting values & responses have everything to do with time and place. In an age of global migration it is important that host countries work with immigrant populations to assert the laws of the land and to leave behind unacceptable practices and subjugations that we have grown out of. That's going to be vey difficult and painfully slow, but the results will be worth it.
The Muslims who teach their kids to hold signs calling for beheadings are no different than Christians who dress their kids in Ku Klux Klan outfits or "God Hates Fags" T-shirts. But, can we please get past expressions of cultural extremism and recognize that most people's, no matter how different they are from one another, basically would like to live together in peace? Because what's happening here is simply the building and maintaining of walls. To what end, I ask - to justify killing children with a sniper's head shots?