• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Global Warming Happy Fun-Time

Forums New posts

Free episodes:

pixelsmith said:
Another manipulated John Cook study.. it has already been exposed for tampering with the polling of opinions to arrive at this so called consensus. Move along folks, just another feeble attempt by a washed up cartoonist to get his 15 minutes of fame.
Click to expand...

And there's the conspiracy theory!
 
People asked to participate in this new study found out his method of pooling his study was manipulating the polling procedures. We are talkin John Cook here Angelo... from the idiotic SkepticalScience website you like. He is a con man.
 
pixelsmith said:
People asked to participate in this new study found out his method of pooling his study was manipulating the polling procedures. We are talkin John Cook here Angelo... from the idiotic SkepticalScience website you like. He is a con man.
Click to expand...

I can say you like the idiotic Watts Up website... This is what I find so interesting about this debate. It really boils down to "my website is more accurate than yours." This is why I tend to leave it up to the experts, and in this case, it's the climate scientists. Most of them say man has had a hand in global warming. They also say it isn't as bad as some alarmists say it is, but it also isn't a hoax like that Watts Up yahoo thinks. But it is happening and we are responsible.
 
I am wrong.. this is a different "consensus". The other thing he was involved with was busted. This one polled SkepticalScience volunteers... the ones drinking the koolaide like Angelo. I wonder why they got 97% agreeing... hmmm... that would be like asking everyone here if we believe sometimes there are strange lights in the sky. 97% here would say yes.
 
Angel of Ioren said:
I can say you like the idiotic Watts Up website... This is what I find so interesting about this debate. It really boils down to "my website is more accurate than yours." This is why I tend to leave it up to the experts, and in this case, it's the climate scientists. Most of them say man has had a hand in global warming. They also say it isn't as bad as some alarmists say it is, but it also isn't a hoax like that Watts Up yahoo thinks. But it is happening and we are responsible.
Click to expand...
What it boils down to is that it has not warmed in 16 years yet CO2 levels continue to climb. Observed data trumps computer models that are programmed by humans.
 
According to the very scientists you believe in we all died in 2000 from starvation due to human caused global cooling.
 
OOPS! we didnt die from cooling... umm... lets see... WARMING! yes we are all going to die from WARMING!!.... oops... it is not warming... hmmm... CLIMATE CHANGE!! yes that's it we are all going to die from global climate change... LMAO... btw... when they realized how STUPID it is to blame humans for something as normal as climate change they again changed it to Global Climate Disruption.. which is just as stupid but they have to keep the ruse going to keep that big green money machine rolling along.
 
A 100% consensus or 1% consensus mean nothing in regards to science. Consensus and science have nothing to do with each other.
 
Listen to the show - it talks about people like you!
It really helps to understand the phenomena of climate change denial and the way people think about it.
 
too bad it hasn't warmed in 16 years, it might make a good story like the global cooling bullshit back in 75
 
You should not even be able to post, we all were supposed to die by 2000 from global cooling and starvation.. then we were all going to die from a depleted ozone layer, now you want to believe the same cooling/ozone people that we are all going to die from not existent global warming... Angelo you should change your name to Chicken Little.
 
pixelsmith said:
You should not even be able to post, we all were supposed to die by 2000 from global cooling and starvation.. then we were all going to die from a depleted ozone layer, now you want to believe the same cooling/ozone people that we are all going to die from not existent global warming... Angelo you should change your name to Chicken Little.
Click to expand...

You see, that's the problem - you automatically label me an alarmist when anyone that has read my posts sees that I am far from that.
Good luck !
 
Back
Top